Legal Opinion

M & M House Moving Co. v. Janis

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1962No. Civ. 25797PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

The plaintiff, a corporation, brought an action against the defendants Janis and Zeff to recover amounts alleged to be due to the plaintiff as the result of ten transactions involving the moving of buildings. The trial court rendered judgment against both defendants and the defendant Janis has appealed therefrom.

The first contention made is that the evidence showed that the obligation, if any, was owed not to the plaintiff corporation but to a partnership which preceded it. The only basis for such assertion is the following testimony of Mr. Mitchell: “Q. Now, in 1958, what was your position…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coutin v. NessanbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API