Legal Opinion

Signaigo v. Begun

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 20PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). Upon 74 of the 80 lots single dwellings have been erected of substantial character. Some of these are not exactly on the building line; some are back of it, and some are in front; there are some of the second stories which also project slightly beyond the building line; but these slight encroachments measuring at most a few inches, and in one case but .24 of an inch, are too inconsequential to merit discussion. The plaintiffs are not estopped by them from protesting against the erection in their neighborhood of an apartment house with 19 apartments and having stores…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Harris v. RorabackMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. McQuade v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. O’connor v. Resort Custom Builders, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Wood v. BlanckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Oosterhouse v. BrummelMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API