Legal Opinion

Oosterhouse v. Brummel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1955No. Docket 33, Calendar 46,456PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The plaintiffs, John E. Oosterhouse and Gertie W. Oosterhouse, platted certain land in Kent county, Michigan, as “Ranch Home Sites,” retaining title to one lot. The area was intended as a high-grade residential district. To that end, numerous restrictions were imposed, all of the deeds, containing similar restrictions. A certain portion of the exterior walls were: to be of brick or stone.. The houses must have not less than a prescribed number of square feet of ground floor area. We will not recite all. We are concerned only with one —the set-back restriction. It reads as follows:

“Houses on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Phillips v. LawlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Signaigo v. BegunMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Austin v. Van HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Longton v. StedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Vetzel v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Wheeler v. Southport Seven Planned Unit DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Jayno Heights Landowners Ass'n v. PrestonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API