Legal Opinion

Harris v. Roraback

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1904No. Docket No. 16PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from "Wayne; Rohnert, J. Bill by Albert S. Harris and others against Edwin C. Roraback and another to restrain the erection of a dwelling. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

The parties to this suit are owners of lots on Woodland avenue, in the city of Detroit. The platters of this property placed in their conveyance of defendants’ property, which ran to defendants’ immediate grantor, the following restriction: “ That the said second party, his heirs and assigns, will not opcupy said premises except for one dwelling house to each lot.” A similar restriction was placed in the conveyance of the property owned by complainants, and in all the conveyances on said avenue except one, and the owner of that excepted lot has complied with the restriction. Defendants have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. UlrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Stone v. PillsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. Paulist Fathers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API