Legal Opinion

Strutz v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2011No. 10AB3075; A147334PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an Employment Appeals Board decision denying him unemployment benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left work without good cause. On review, claimant contends that he had good cause to leave work because he was instructed to follow what he believed to be an unethical work policy that was undisputedly contrary to industry standards. He argues that the board’s conclusion that he had three reasonable alternatives to quitting work and that, therefore, his departure was without good cause is not supported by substantial evidence and substantial reason. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDowell v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bremer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Warkentin v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Westrope v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kay v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Aguilar v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. SAIF Corp. v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API