Legal Opinion

Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2008No. A128497PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Petitioner was released on 12 months’ post-prison supervision after serving a term of imprisonment on convictions for possession of a controlled substance and manufacture or delivery of a counterfeit substance. He petitions for judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision imposing special sex offender conditions of post-prison supervision, to be implemented at the discretion of petitioner’s supervising officer. We affirm.

The facts are not disputed. Petitioner committed his drug-related crimes in October 1998 and was sentenced in September 2002. In its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Castro v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Strutz v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Roberts v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API