Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Petitioner was released on 12 months’ post-prison supervision after serving a term of imprisonment on convictions for possession of a controlled substance and manufacture or delivery of a counterfeit substance. He petitions for judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision imposing special sex offender conditions of post-prison supervision, to be implemented at the discretion of petitioner’s supervising officer. We affirm.
The facts are not disputed. Petitioner committed his drug-related crimes in October 1998 and was sentenced in September 2002. In its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Castro v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Strutz v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Roberts v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008