Warkentin v. Employment Department
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Claimant seeks judicial review of a decision by the Employment Appeals Board (board) that disqualified her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c). Claimant contends that the decision is not supported by substantial evidence. ORS 183.482(8)(c). We agree and, accordingly, reverse and remand.
We take the facts from the board’s findings and from the undisputed evidence in the record that is not inconsistent with those findings. Claimant was employed by Northwest Cardiologists (employer) as a patient…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- McDowell v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Hertel v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Hertel v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Campbell v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- WaterWatch of Oregon v. Water Resources Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Strutz v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Early v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.