Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Satterfield

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 2013No. 0900060H; A148357Published

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Petitioners SAIF Corporation (SAIF) and McIntyre Construction-Fuller Cabinets (McIntyre)1 seek judicial review of a final order of the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (director). In that order, the director concluded that SAIF had improperly terminated claimant’s eligibility for vocational assistance, finding that SAIF had not obtained “new information” indicating that claimant was no longer eligible for such assistance as then required b j former OAR 436-120-0350 (12/1/07).2 Petitioners assign error to that conclusion, specifically arguing that three new medical…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Portland Ass'n of Teachers v. Multnomah School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Asten-Hill Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API