Legal Opinion

Kay v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 2017No. 2015EAB0518; A160405PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.

Claimant petitions for review of an order by the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denying her unemployment benefits. On appeal, claimant raises two assignments of error. First, claimant argues that the EAB erred in concluding that she voluntarily left her employment. Second, claimant argues that the EAB’s order lacked substantial evidence and reason when it concluded that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We write only to address claimant’s second assignment of error. Claimant argues that the EAB lacked substantial evidence and reason for its conclusion that she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDowell v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Campbell v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Westrope v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Nielsen v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Strutz v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clackamas County Employees' Assn. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Blevins v. Div. of Med. Assistance ProgramsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Kay v. Emp't Dep'tCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API