Legal Opinion
State v. Sinclair
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 12, 1981PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole issue on this appeal is whether an information charging the defendant with being a persistent felony offender in violation of General Statutes § 53a-40 (b) 1 is sufficient even though it does not allege that the defendant was imprisoned as a result of his prior felony convic tion. On September 26, 1979, the defendant was convicted after a jury trial of third degree burglary and third degree larceny. Third degree burglary is a class D felony. General Statutes §§ 53a-103, 53a-103a.
The day after his conviction the defendant pleaded not guilty to part II of the information alleging that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. GradySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. LaSelvaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. DashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Logan v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. McElveenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.