Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 22, 1974PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.

On a trial to a jury the defendant was found guilty of attempting to obtain money by false pretenses in violation of General Statutes § 53-360 (repealed by Public Acts 1969, No. 828, effective October 1, 1971). In pertinent part, this statute provided for a penalty for any person “who, by any false token, pretense or device, obtains from another any valuable thing . . . with intent to defraud him or any other person.” The defendant has appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict. Of his four assignments of error, he has briefed three and the fourth is considered *262to have been abandoned.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BausmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. State v. BeaulieuSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Begley v. Kohl & Madden Printing Ink Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. EasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. State v. SumnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API