Legal Opinion
State v. McElveen
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 6, 2009No. AC 29638PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, William McElveen, was convicted of larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-119 and 53a-125b (a) and subsequently was given an enhanced sentence as a persistent larceny offender pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-40 (e). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the state adduced insufficient evidence to support a finding that he was a persistent larceny offender, (2) the part B information charging him with being a persistent larceny offender was defective, thereby depriving him of his constitutional right to due process under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. VelascoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Barlow v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Patterson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Massey v. TOWN OF BRANFORDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. BreeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. ReddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.