Legal Opinion
State v. Grady
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 28, 1965PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
The defendant, at the time of the institution of this prosecution, was serving a prison sentence imposed upon his conviction of crimes com mitted in Hartford County. Apparently under General Statutes § 54-139, construed and explained in State v. Springer, 149 Conn. 244, 178 A.2d 525, lie had applied for a trial of the New London County charges alleged in the first part of the information. In any event, the state was required to, and did, obtain a writ of habeas corpus ad respondendum in order to have Grady taken from the state prison and brought before the Superior Court for plea, election…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.