Legal Opinion

In Re Loigman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1990No. 90-94PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility

' PER CURIAM:

This matter is before this court on the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) that respondent receive reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule XI, § 11(c) of this court’s Rules Governing the District of Columbia Bar. We adopt the Board’s recommendation.

Respondent is a member of the bar of the state of New Jersey and of the District of Columbia. On November 13, 1989, this court received notice of a decision of the Supreme Court of New Jersey that respondent had been publicly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Matter of HudockDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. BattistelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re DreierDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API