Legal Opinion

Matter of Hudock

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1988No. 87-1105PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, Robert P. Hudock, an attorney practicing in Virginia and in the District of Columbia, was publicly reprimanded by the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board for charging an illegal fee. The State Board’s action was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Virginia. Hudock v. Virginia State Bar, 233 Va. 390, 355 S.E. 2d 601 (1987). The discipline in Virginia was ordered after Hudock had failed to disclose a contingency fee agreement with his client in a workmen’s compensation proceeding and had collected a fee of $5,000 out of an award of $15,000. The Industrial Commission of Virginia had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudock v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF VIRGINIACourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  2. Hudock v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. In Re TraversDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. In Re BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API