Legal Opinion
In Re Hutchinson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 8, 1986No. 85-53PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
In this disciplinary case, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) found that respondent Hutchinson’s untruthful testimony before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February 1982 was conduct involving moral turpitude that adversely reflected on his fit*996ness to practice law, in violation of Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3); conduct involving dishonesty and misrepresentation, in violation of DR 1-102(A)(4); and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of DR 1-102(A)(5).1 The Board also found that Hutchinson’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.