In Re Dreier
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Respondent, Harry Dreier, an attorney licensed to practice law in New Jersey and the District of Columbia, was publicly reprimanded by the Supreme Court of New Jersey for lack of diligence, failure to communicate with a client, and failure to cooperate with the ethics authorities. The discipline arose out of respondent’s failure to file a New Jersey transfer tax return which respondent had prepared for a client, his failure to return her telephone calls inquiring about the matter, and his failure to respond to communications from an investigator for the disciplinary authorities about his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re LoigmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re LaibstainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. CalderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- In Re KirkilesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In re DreierDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.