Legal Opinion

Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. Battistelli

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1991No. 19874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice:

This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding pursuant to the reciprocal discipline provisions of Article VI, Section 28-A of the By-Laws of the West Virginia State Bar. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Court of Appeals) found that the respondent, Geary M. Bat-tistelli, had misrepresented facts in an appeal before that court and ordered him to pay double the costs of the appeal. The Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar (Committee) now asks us to impose a fine in the same amount, to issue a public reprimand, and to charge the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. The Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California v. John M. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Fetters v. HottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. BattistelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BattistelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. PostWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. George P. Stanton, IIIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BattistelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API