State Ex Rel. North v. Goetz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.
The Waukesha city clerk received a petition, with an attached proposed ordinance, from a member of the public demanding that it be forwarded to the city council for consideration, pursuant to sec. 9.20, Stats. The clerk refused to forward it because she believed the proposal was administrative, not legislative, and, therefore, did not fall under the statute. The petition’s circulator, Ralph M. North, appeals from a trial court denial of his writ of mandamus. Because we conclude that the city clerk’s duties under sec. 9.20 are ministerial only, such that she has no quasi-judicial authority to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Town of Vernon v. Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Miller v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lank v. RzentkowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Building & Construction Trades Council of South Central Wisconsin v. Waunakee Community School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Gieseke v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Ahlgren v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Town of Clearfield v. CushmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.