Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1977No. 76-158PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

This case poses the question of whether a city council can be compelled by mandamus to place on the ballot a referendum question for the adoption of an ordinance initiated in proper form in accordance with sec. 9.20(1), Stats., but which ordinance the common council, on the advice of the city attorney, has concluded is in violation of state statutes and is unconstitutional. We conclude that mandamus is appropriate under such circumstances, and we hold that the trial court erred when it denied the petition for a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we reverse.

On January 20, 1976, a petition signed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Mulkey v. ReitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Blotter v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Farley v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hessey v. BurdenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. West Hartford Taxpayers Assn., Inc. v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Davidson v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Berent v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API