Legal Opinion
Arakelian v. Sears
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 25, 1921No. Civ. No. 2273PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On April 6, 1915, Charles Murray and W. A. Jones and their wives were the owners of the lands in controversy situated in the county of Merced. On said date they executed and delivered to the Commercial and Savings Bank of Stockton a deed of trust covering said lands together with another small tract to secure a loan of ten thousand dollars. This deed of trust was recorded in said county on April 14, 1915. On February 17, 1916, this deed of trust was assigned by said hank to the First National Bank of Modesto. On May 12, 1916, the indebtedness secured by this deed of trust being due and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Levy v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Roberts v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Stockwell v. BarnumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Morrow v. GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Burke v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Silver v. ShemanskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hasenjeager v. VothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- McClure v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935