Legal Opinion

Silver v. Shemanski

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1949No. Civ. 16425PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Benjamin & Lieberman, Benjamin & Kronick, in pro. per., Bodkin, Breslin & Buddy, S. V. O. Prichard and Wiseman & Elmore for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This litigation was instituted by Marc Silver through the filing by him on October 29, 1945, of a complaint for declaratory relief, naming as defendants, Joseph Shemanski, as executor of the last will and testament of Isidor Silver, deceased, and Helen Silver, widow of said decedent. In such complaint for declaratory relief, the terms and provisions of the last will and testament of Isidor Silver were alleged, with the claim that by clause 5 of the will it was expressly and impliedly agreed and understood by and between the decedent, Isidor Silver and his wife, defendant Helen Silver, and was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Susan J. Mayors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Gregory v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. R. J. Cardinal Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API