Legal Opinion

Levy v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1896No. Sac. No. 96PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. J. R. Webb, Judge. . The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appeals from the judgment and from the order denying plaintiff a new trial. The action was for the recovery of certain property, or for the value thereof, levied upon and sold by the defendant, the sheriff of Fresno county, under a judgment obtained by the Sussex Shoe Company, a corporation, against Henry Brack. The judgment in favor of defendant Scott was rendered under and in accordance with the verdict of the jury.

Plaintiff claimed as owner. Defendant’s contention was that the property belonged to Henry Brack; that plaintiff’s claim of ownership was simulated and invalid, and that, in any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Godchaux v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Angell v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Porter v. BucherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Ford v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Maxson v. LlewelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API