Legal Opinion

Stockwell v. Barnum

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1908No. Civ. No. 428PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The action is to have set aside and vacated a sale made under a deed of trust by the Title Insurance and Trust Company, a corporation, as trustee, of certain real property. ' Judgment was rendered for defendants. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which motion was denied. The appeal is from the judgment and order.

On November 10, 1904, Sparkman and wife made their promissory note, whereby they promised to pay to Anna B. Brown and Bettina B. Brown, or order, at the Security Savings Bank of Los Angeles, the sum of $1,800, and delivered the same to said Anna and Bettina B. Brown. The note by its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Felton v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Herbert Kraft Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Harlin v. NationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Pacific Bank v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Salfield v. Sutter County Land Improvement & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Calvo v. HSBC Bank USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Haynes v. Emc Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. In re RichterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. In Re SalazarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2011
  5. Cruz v. Aurora Loan Services LLC (In Re Cruz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API