Legal Opinion
Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. Froines
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 2009No. S-13228PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Valdez Fisheries Development Association, Inc., appeals an award of attorney's fees. It argues that the fee award misinterprets this court's earlier opinion reversing and remanding the original award of attorney's fees in this case. We agree, and remand for recalculation of the fee award.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In May 2000 Chris Froines filed suit against Valdez Fisheries, seeking damages for breach of contract1. On December 15, 2008, Froines made an Alaska Civil Rule 68 offer of judgment to settle the dispute if Valdez Fisheries would pay him $15,000.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Cook Schuhmann & Groseclose, Inc. v. Brown & Root, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Gamble v. Northstore PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Krone v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Cooper v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.