Legal Opinion

Krone v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2009No. S-12783PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Class representatives prevailed in a class action suit concerning state constitutional rights. The pro bono fee agreement between the class representatives and their attorneys provided that the attorneys would be entitled to receive any attorney's fees awarded to the class representatives at the conclusion of the case. The superior court determined that the class representatives were public interest litigants and awarded them attorney's fees by: (1) determining appropriate hourly rates for their pro bono attorneys; (2) multiplying those rates by an…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Humphrey v. Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Alaska Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API