Alaska Fur Gallery, Inc. v. First National Bank Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
'sulting superior court proceedings. A family of business owners obtained a bank loan to invest in a fledgling hotel project. The family later sued the bank, alleging that one of its loan officers fraudulently induced them to invest in the project. This appeal concerns numerous aspects of the reIn par ticular, the family claims that the bank committed a fraud upon the court through inaccurate and inconsistent portrayals of the loan officer's conduct. We conclude that although some testimony offered by the bank may have been misleading, it was not…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Erick Rios Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Luther v. LanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Windel v. CarnahanAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Recreational Data Services, Inc. v. Trimble Navigation LimitedAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Marshall v. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Boiko v. KapolchokAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.