Cook Schuhmann & Groseclose, Inc. v. Brown & Root, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The beneficiary of a second deed of trust contends that a nonjudicial foreclosure sale on the first deed of trust was not fair and reasonable and violated the controlling statutes. The trustee halted the sale and postponed it for four hours to give two prospective bidders time to obtain cash or cashier’s checks. Because this procedure was not unfair or unreasonable under the circumstances presented here, we affirm the summary judgment for Brown & Root, Inc., whose offset bid was the only bid received at the reconvened sale auction. We also…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Kellis v. CritesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Jaso v. McCarthyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- MacKie v. ChizmarAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Progressive Corp. v. Peter Ex Rel. PeterAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Ellison v. Plumbers & Steam Fitters Union Local 375Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Pagenkopf v. Chatham Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.