Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1945No. Crim. 1915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

By his petition for a writ of habeas corpus petitioner alleges that he is now unlawfully imprisoned and restrained of his liberty by the warden of Folsom penitentiary in that he has served the maximum term of imprisonment as provided by law on the legal portion of the judgment under which he was committed.

The information to which petitioner pleaded guilty and under which he was adjudged to be an habitual criminal, charged him with the commission of a prior felony in the State of New Mexico, for which he was convicted and served a term in prison in that state. Respondent concedes that the New…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of MorckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. People v. McChesneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. In Re ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. In Re LeypoldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. In Re KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API