Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Connell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1945No. Crim. 1897PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Petitioner alleges that he is now unlawfully imprisoned, confined and restrained of his liberty by the warden of the penitentiary at Folsom, in that he has served, with the'benefit of credits earned and granted, the maximum term of imprisonment provided by law for the offense with which he was charged, and that the judgment and commitment under which he is held are void upon the face thereof. He further alleges and the record shows that in an information filed in Los Angeles County in 1935 he was charged with burglary and two prior convictions of felony, one of the priors being denominated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. LohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. JeffriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Slater v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  4. People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. McChesneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API