Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Finley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1968No. Crim. 11721PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

68 Cal.2d 389 (1968)

438 P.2d 381

66 Cal. Rptr. 733

In re WILLIAM JOSEPH FINLEY on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. Crim. 11721.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

March 18, 1968.

William Joseph Finley, in pro. per., and Charles Y. Boeggeman, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, Raymond M. Momboisse and Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

TRAYNOR, C.J.

In 1946 a jury found petitioner guilty of first degree robbery. The information alleged and petitioner admitted prior convictions of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API