Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1955No. 578PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

Ordinarily, where separate bills of indictment are returned and the bills are consolidated for trial, as authorized by G.S. 15-152, the counts contained in the respective bills will be treated as though they were separate counts in one bill, and where there are several counts and each count is for a distinct offense, a general verdict of guilty will authorize the imposition of a judgment on each count. S. v. Braxton, 230 N.C. 312, 52 S.E. 2d 895; S. v. Harvell, 199 N.C. 599, 155 S.E. 257; S. v. Mills, 181 N.C. 530, 106 S.E. 677.

Likewise, where there are several counts in a bill, and a general…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. PridgeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. In Re SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Goode v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Wilson v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. PledgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API