Legal Opinion
Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, Jr
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 12, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7284PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the Board of Appeals’ affirmance of the examiner’s rejection of claims 4 through 15, the only re*558maining claims of appellants’ application, serial No. 728,056, for “Isotope Production,” filed March 21, 1958.
The invention relates to a method for the production and recovery of radioactive isotopes through detonation of a nuclear device of the fission or fusion type in a suitable geological formation. The device is composed of at least a critical amount of neutron target material and is detonated “to provide for a substantially instantaneous liberation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Land v. DreyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Application of Constantin ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Walter Lorenz and Richard WeglerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Jean Maurice GazaveCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, Jr. Application of Hampton G. Corneil, Andrew D. Suttle, Jr., and Winfred O. MilliganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.