Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, Jr. Application of Hampton G. Corneil, Andrew D. Suttle, Jr., and Winfred O. Milligan
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
These are two appeals from decisions of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of all claims in each of appellants’ patent applications1 directed to methods of exploding a nuclear device in a subsurface cavern. While separate records and briefs were filed in each appeal, they were consolidated for argument here by counsel and we shall dispose of both appeals in a single opinion.
The subject matter of the present appeals bears close relation to the subject matter of Appeal Nos. 7284, 347 F.2d 557 and 7295, 347 F.2d 563, decided concurrently herewith.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of Walter Lorenz and Richard WeglerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
3Cited by2 opinions
- Application of Jean Maurice GazaveCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, Jr. Application of Hampton G. Corneil, Andrew D. Suttle, Jr., and Winfred O. MilliganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965