Application of Jean Maurice Gazave
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of process claims 1-9 and composition claims 10-13 1 for “lack of proof of therapeutic utility.”
The application discloses therapeutic compositions containing certain isofla-vone compounds of the formula where
R1 may be a hydroxyl (-OH) or an alkoxy group; R2 may be hydrogen or hydroxyl; R3 may represent hydrogen, or a carboxyl radical (-COOH) which may be free, esterified or in salt form.
As to the manner in which those compounds are useful, the specification states:
* * * The chief…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Application of Carl Peter KrimmelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- In re ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- In re NovakCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Smith v. BousquetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- Application of Robert R. CitronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re JollesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- Application of Walter E. ButingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- In re SichertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Application of Paul D. HarwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Marcella FerensCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969