In re Chilowsky
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWoRLey, Judge
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the final rejection by the Primary- .Examiner of all the claims of appellant’s application, No. 568,986, filed December 20,1944, for a patent on a method and apparatus for extraction and utilization of the thermal energy resulting from atomic decomposition of uranium and its compounds. It is the first cáse to come before us involving the utilization of nuclear fission for the production of useful energy. Argument thereon was first' heard March 8,1955, but in view of the complex nature of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- In Re PerrigoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In re ThompsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re Miguel F. Brana, Jose M.C. Berlanga, Marina M. Moset, Erich Schlick and Gerhard KeilhauerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Gordon Gould v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Joseph W. Newman v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Application of Gordon Henry Cook and Peter Arnold MerigoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.