Legal Opinion
Application of Walter Lorenz and Richard Wegler
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 25, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6787PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
The sole issue here is whether appellants’ application 1 satisfies the requirements of See. 112, 35 U.S.C. The examiner held it did not. The board affirmed. Appellants ask this court to reverse that holding. 2
Sec. 112 provides, in part:
“The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same and shall set forth the best mode…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of Le BaronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- L. & C. Hardtmuth, Inc. v. Fabrique Suisse De Crayons Caran D'Ache S.A.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
3Cited by17 opinions
- Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Karl Folkers and Clifford H. ShunkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Paul DiedrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Hampton G. Corneil and Andrew D. Suttle, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Paul Schmidt and Max WilhelmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.