Legal Opinion
Application of Constantin Chilowsky
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 20, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6817PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
Over 17 years ago, on December 20, 1944, Constantin Chilowsky filed patent application Ser. No. 568,986, the application at bar, for “Method and Apparatus for Extraction and Utilization of the Energy Resulting from Atomic Decomposition of Uranium and its Compounds.” Over 6 years ago, on January 20, 1956, this court, after a second oral argument, reversed a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which held the claims in this same application insufficient, indefinite and based on an inoperative disclosure and remanded the case because “the Patent Office tribunals have not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- In re ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Frank P. Bennett v. John Halahan, Theodore F. Aronson and Floyd A. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
3Cited by18 opinions
- Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Application of Sigurd I. LindellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Paul J. Naquin, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Bernhard W. A. Weber and Hugh D. McLeeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Francis J. Honn and Willard M. SimsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.