Legal Opinion
Dickinson v. Electric Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1935No. Civ. 10513PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs’ assignor, as lessor, leased to defendant certain premises for a period of fifteen years ending December 29, 1939, for a gross rental of $360,000 payable in monthly instalments of $2,000 each, which rental was reduced by mutual agreement to $1200 per month for a period commencing April 23, 1932, and continuing until May 29, 1933, when plaintiffs gave notice to defendant that they elected to and did restore the $2,000 per month rate provided in the lease. Defendant corporation, by appropriate proceedings in the United States District Court, was placed in the hands…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kottler v. New York Bargain House, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Treff v. GulkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. AugustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Steiner v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Dickinson v. Universal Service Stations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Berghoff v. KoblitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.