Legal Opinion

Berghoff v. Koblitz

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1953No. Civ. No. 19436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT (Robert H.), J. pro tem.

Defendant and erosseomplainant appeals from an adverse judgment in a ease which grew out of a lease between the parties. Plaintiff brought suit for declaratory relief, cancellation of lease and return of money deposited. Cross-complainant sought money damages.

In December, 1946, defendant leased to plaintiff certain business real property described as 911-13-15 North La Cienega Boulevard, Los Angeles. It was a one-story building containing eleven or twelve business offices (excepting a three room suite in the rear portion of the building leased to another tenant).…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Yates v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Dorcich v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Dickinson v. Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradford Hotel Operating Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  2. Bradford Hotel Operating Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API