Berghoff v. Koblitz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT (Robert H.), J. pro tem.
Defendant and erosseomplainant appeals from an adverse judgment in a ease which grew out of a lease between the parties. Plaintiff brought suit for declaratory relief, cancellation of lease and return of money deposited. Cross-complainant sought money damages.
In December, 1946, defendant leased to plaintiff certain business real property described as 911-13-15 North La Cienega Boulevard, Los Angeles. It was a one-story building containing eleven or twelve business offices (excepting a three room suite in the rear portion of the building leased to another tenant).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Yates v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Dorcich v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Dickinson v. Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bradford Hotel Operating Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
- Bradford Hotel Operating Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956