De Hart v. Allen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
In an action for damages for breach of a lease plaintiffs had judgment from which the defendant has appealed.
Prior to July 3, 1931, the defendant leased premises from the predecessor in interest of these plaintiffs for the purpose of conducting a “bootleg place” for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. On that date he offered to renew the lease for the same purpose and the then owner agreed to these terms and entered into a written lease with the defendant whereby she let the premises for a period of five years ending August 1, 1936, at a monthly rental of $250. In November, 1933,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Phillips-Hollman, Inc. v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Andrews v. ReidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Senter v. BF Goodrich CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954
- Barlow v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.