Legal Opinion

Beers v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 2006No. CV00316; A122059PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Defendants own and operate a golf course and driving range on property adjacent to plaintiffs home and property. Plaintiff brought this action for nuisance, trespass, and negligence based on her allegation that golf balls hit from defendants’ driving range were landing on her property and hitting her house. Among other defenses, defendants asserted that they had obtained a prescriptive easement giving them the right to allow golf balls to go onto plaintiffs property. Defendants also filed a counterclaim, seeking to recover the cost of erecting a 70-foot-high fence between the driving range…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Thompson v. SchuhOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kondor v. ProseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Arrien v. LevangerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Montagne v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGrath v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Sander v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Lawrence v. Clubcorp NV II, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2024
  5. McGrath v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API