Legal Opinion

Faulconer v. Williams

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1998No. CC 95-10169; CA A93542; SC S44308PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The issue in this real property dispute is whether an express easement over plaintiffs’ property was extinguished through adverse possession, although deeds to the property given after the claimed period of adverse possession continued to refer to the easement. The trial court held that the easement continues to exist. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the easement was extinguished by adverse possession during the period of ownership of one of plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest and that reference to the extinguished easement in later deeds did not operate to re-create the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bond v. O'GaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Garza v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. WederskiOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Wels v. HippeOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Hansen v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lieberfreund v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API