Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Schuh

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1979No. TC 20846, SC 25574PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

Plaintiffs (Thompson) appeal from a decree by the trial court declaring that they have no rights to use a roadway located on defendants’ (Schuh) land. This is a suit in equity with two counts, the first seeking a declaration that plaintiffs acquired by prescription an easement in common with defendants for ingress and egress to their Columbia County property. The second count, also seeking a declaration that plaintiffs be allowed to use the road, alleges an easement by implication and/or necessity.

In this case for declaratory relief held before the trial judge without a jury, we try the facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cheney v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Oregon Construction Co. v. Allen Ditch Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cole v. GilvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  5. Kondor v. ProseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API