Trautman v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.
Petitioners Nena Lovinger and Paul Conte seek judicial review of a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), affirming a decision by the City of Eugene (city) to grant approval to Oakleigh Meadows Co-Housing, LLC (applicant) for a tentative planned unit development (PUD). Among other things, LUBA concluded that a public notice of a limited hearing was adequate, although the record later was reopened for new evidence and testimony, contrary to the notice provided. In their first assignment of error, petitioners argue that the city failed to provide adequate notice, thereby depriving…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Montagne v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Hammer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Apalategui v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Central Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- LandWatch Lane County v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- Bowerman v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Bowerman v. Lane Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Conte v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.