Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Parham

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 26, 1963No. 16,776PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Fekguson, Judge:

Tried before a general court-martial convened at Kaiserslautern, Germany, by the Commanding General, Northern Area Command, the accused was found guilty of robbery and sodomy in violation, respectively, of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Articles 122 and 125, 10 USC §§ 922, 925. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for four years, and reduction. The convening authority reduced the period of confinement involved to one year, but otherwise approved the penalty. With appellate counsel…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. McCraryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. O'NealUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. BrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. Morris v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ReddingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. RogersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. BurgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API