Legal Opinion

United States v. Armstrong

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 7, 1954No. 2926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSman, Judge:

The issue of sufficiency of the evidence to support findings has been raised by the accused’s petition in this case. An Army general court-martial had found him guilty under a specification alleging housebreaking, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 130, 50 USC § 724. He was sentenced to receive the maximum punishment imposable for this offense —and the convening authority approved the findings, although he reduced the sentence. Affirmance by a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General followed.

II

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CreamerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. StewartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. In Re CollinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. ChurnovicUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. ZagarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. LowryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. KowertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. BrooksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API