United States v. Armstrong
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. BROSman, Judge:
The issue of sufficiency of the evidence to support findings has been raised by the accused’s petition in this case. An Army general court-martial had found him guilty under a specification alleging housebreaking, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 130, 50 USC § 724. He was sentenced to receive the maximum punishment imposable for this offense —and the convening authority approved the findings, although he reduced the sentence. Affirmance by a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General followed.
II
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CreamerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. StewartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- In Re CollinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. ChurnovicUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. ZagarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. LowryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. KowertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. BrooksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.