United States v. Redding
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Kilday, Judge:
Both accused and the victim in this unfortunate incident — one Spurlock— were assigned to sentry duty at Larson Air Force Base, Washington. On the afternoon in question, the pair had adjacent posts, guarding combat alert aircraft. Each was armed with a .38 caliber pistol. In the course of the events hereinafter recounted, accused’s weapon fired, shooting Spur-lock in the right chest.
As a result, accused was tried by general court-martial. He pleaded not guilty, but was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. BackleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. WeemsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. SandovalUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. TobinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. YoakumU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. GordonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. SchoolfieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. FergusonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.