Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 2016No. D068538APublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IRION, J.

J.—Plaintiff 569 East County Boulevard LLC et al. (plaintiffs) filed an action against numerous entities and individuals. Plaintiffs’ complaint named Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc. (BAD), as a defendant and alleged a single cause of action against BAD for unlawful interference with prospective economic advantage. BAD moved to strike the action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, 1 commonly referred to as the anh-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute. (Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53, 57 [124…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Marroquin v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. Hanna v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Etcheson v. FCA US LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Nishiki v. Danko Meredith, APC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Fox v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API