Legal Opinion
Fox v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 20, 2018No. A153672PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStreeter, J.
*531I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioners Ardella and Robert Fox (the Foxes) seek a writ of mandate compelling the superior court to grant their motion for trial preference and set a trial date within 120 days of this court's issuance of writ relief. We requested opposition to the petition and advised the parties we may grant a peremptory writ under Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 180, 203 Cal.Rptr. 626, 681 P.2d 893 ( Palma ). Only 1 of 18 defendants opposed the Foxes' petition. Having reviewed the petition, opposition, and supporting documentation, we shall grant the writ…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Ng v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- 569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Rice v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Landers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Daws v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Isaak v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. LandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. LandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019